June 25th, 2024, should be celebrated as the day God semi-rescued humankind from powerful evil governments, a day against censor mongers. Throughout History, the biggest danger humankind faced was and is still censorship, especially legalized censorship. This literally means both God and the best of humankind have a lot of work to do — we want total victory, not just a goal or incomplete victory. It means to study the facts in a deep sense and sensitize the world on where humans fell short, to warrant the hard test God allowed. Our biggest mistakes include lack of systems of exposing new laws and lack of foresight on dangerous laws.
When laws are made, the politicians will always argue the possible good it will do, but who will be able to see the possible and probable evil of bad laws? First, we lack great systems of informing the public about new laws and how to get the greatest minds to discuss the potential dangers. Laws are often too lengthy to have space in traditional print media as example, but now we have social media, websites of mainstream media should have all laws and allow comments; and new NGOs for world freedom should emerge. Considering algorithms and other censoring ways, New-york Times+ should not say Amnesty International+ is enough. Hard-disks are now too cheap to say the summary of journalists is enough, when we can get summary and actual detail of the law, plus how lawmakers voted. Many of us may visit the websites of human rights organizations few times in a year compared to media houses.
My point is when the u.s government made the law of the ‘espionage act’, where the accused is not allowed to even explain why he or she broke a bad law, that is a scary law and almost like no trial. Again, we must differentiate coverage from enough coverage, because I did not know about that law until Snowden educated us. With enough coverage, such laws should be fought by voting out the supporters of such laws, by suing the government to supreme court and international courts; and by holding vigils, asking God to send visible and/or invisible angels to rescue humankind and punish devils who think government wrongs should never be exposed.
I think Wikileaks+ should have fought this law long before the arrest warrant against Assange. Whether or not they knew about the law, my point is Assange and every caring person should now fight to remove that law. Specialization helps, because millions may donate and help erase that law, but may not support the other laws I want to fight. So who will set up an NGO to fight for ‘right to real trial and explain to judge and jury…’?
The other dangerous law that is still hanging on our heads is the blank check on classified information. As said, bad politicians will claim when we are hunting Bin Laden, we need to protect certain information. Fine! But we also need laws that say the government does not have the right to lie or commit cruelty on innocent people in our name! Sweet talking Obamas, Trumps, and xyz will easily agree and make only promises. So we need another law that says exposing government lies and cruelties should never be a crime, including classified information. So as long as you can convince a jury or judge that you saw the video of the killing of a journalist+ in Palestine or Ukraine, protecting Israel or Biden in the name of ‘interest’ or classified information can be challenged without fear.
The tiny victories God gave us is not just freeing of Assange to the delight of millions of Americans and billions around the world; it also includes Snowden and other Americans, including a woman who exposed Trump in much more beneficial ways than Stormy Daniels… Oh Jarga, are you a sexist, claiming women are not brave or caring enough to expose government wrongs? Maybe, but I am also saying the best of women exist and should understand the devils either hate men more or fear and bank on women more to do countless evil.
We cannot discuss Julian Assange without discussing women and the Iraq war, because there are huge connections. George Bush, while rallying support for war, claimed: ‘to free the women of Iraq and the Arab world…’ Once women are mentioned, permission granted! Or resistance reduced? So while trying to free women, if you harm women+ in Iraq and still claim you can classify it, then the ‘sexist’ Jarga says exposing it should not be a crime. Maybe we should learn from their play-book to pass one law before another law. Let us propose a law that any classified information that include the killing of a woman, rape of a woman, or any vivid harm against a woman or LGBTQ can be exposed, even if classified. Gradually, some good women may admit certain wrongs to men is not permissible either.
Beside the Iraq war, the devils knew by accusing Assange of rape, they can dent his support even without providing any evidence. If we study the dangers of blank checks to governments and women, then extradition of rape accusations across countries must be studied and how much evidence must be presented to even press charges. How many rape accusations Sweden or any country ever sought extradition on? How many rape accusations UK, U.S, or any country ever considered extradition on? If I write a book that ‘threatens’ the world or just their political world, any American girl I ever spent time with can accuse me of rape? Or they can send a pretty American to spend time with me and claim rape for extradition? The mindset is dangerous and my foolish type may fight it very differently than Assange chose to. Whereas I cannot categorically say Assange or any person is above rape, I am saying human laws and mindsets around rape are largely bad; plus extradition requests on rape should demand higher evidence, or evil women will always be available as volunteers or paid with protection.
The fractional men, half women, and female politicians on Assange and censorship. Assange rose to prominence during the Obama era, and I consider Obama a fractional man on many things in the world of justice. The good thing manly, or brave thing about Obama on Assange is refusing to directly charge Assange in respect for Journalists, not love for truth. If he was truly manly, Assange should have been rewarded and honored more than the white men and white women who illegally helped blacks during slavery+. Breaking unjust laws is manly and very important at times. So where is Obama a sissy? Obama-Biden verifiably stopped all credit card companies from helping Assange gather billions or millions, after exposing the Iraq war crimes. I was fairly well-off then, and I wrote a hundred dollar check for Wikileaks, but they stopped the check(s) through the mail. My point is Obama+ waged an economic war-fare against Wikileaks and my very self thereafter. It is vital for history to document such facts, help companies resist bad government requests, and educate would-be activists to understand that the government may refuse to listen and instead war differently on some activists.
Trump I dubbed ‘the first female president of the u.s’, considering some idiots claim ‘Bill Clinton is the first black president of the u.s’. Hello good females, please do not get mad, just help me find good females as president or let’s look for a real man to be a president of the u.s or the world. After that title to mr. Clinton, we had bad or ok black Obama, so maybe we should pray or getting ok, good, or great female president of the u.s? Anyway, Trump is so thin skinned than average females, but Trump is also very deceptive like many females? Trump will tell you what you want to hear, like those bad men who seek women for sex as nicer than marijuana? My point is good and bad are beyond gender, but some things seem to have leanings.
Trump understood many people love Assange and Truth, so he said nice things about Assange while running against ms. Clinton, to get votes? After winning the presidency, Trump hunted Assange in ways ‘bad’ Obama never did. I wish Biden resigns or at least say on a debate or ad: Trump hates Journalists for truth, not the occasional lies; so Trump hates super journalists like Assange; went after him, so that devils can go after journalists thereafter? Average females may be better than Trump, but he seems better than the worst of females in and beyond politics. Trump is so deceptive, he even deceives smart and deceptive journalists who oppose him. It puzzles me when anti-trump journalists claim Trump fulfils election promises. Well, Trump ignores good promises and tries to fulfil bad promises. Trump knows people love truth and the questionable JFK, so he promised to declassify all files of JFK assassination for votes, but did he fulfil that promise by what percentage? Obama pardoned Chelsea Manning out of conscience; Biden pardoned Assange for votes or due to pressure; Trump did not pardon any major whistle blower, he instead re-prosecuted Manning, went After Assange and others. I am not afraid of Trump’s presidency, but let no one expect much good through Trump and that does not mean to vote Biden. Vote your conscience.
Since people think we unnecessarily oppose women, but the world, especially the u.s is yet to have good female politicians and Assange happens to be a good example. Assange barely existed during the end of the Bush presidency. Ms. Palin was the first female close to the presidency and she said ‘the u.s should use special forces to assassinate Assange’ for speaking truth or exposing cruelty? You hear that from female Palin and Obama never used such, we did not choose Obama because he was a man or black, nor did we oppose Palin because of her gender. We are praying for all humans to be good, but we are not sparing bad females who want to be brave or cruel with a pen. Does Palin have the guts to face Assange or to truthful folks in a fist or gun fight? She wants to use robot minded men to fight truthful men and classify the killings and other harms?
Ms. Clinton never said anything good about Assange, instead she blamed him for her election losses. Whereas I cannot ascertain Assange exposing her wrongs cost her votes, but she and the u.s system cost her the election. People like me remembered how she claimed she will ‘obliterate Iran’ if Iran attacked Israel. Such statements and her actions in and beyond Libya contributed to why I opposed her more than what Assange exposed on election rigging. If she thinks election rigging should not be exposed, then should we consider Trump claims of election rigging and charge Trump with gross negligence to allow multiple rigging in multiple states? Perhaps we need a law that says election rigging cannot be classified. Because the law says, a president can classify anything. Presidents seem to get a blank check than even women and LGBTQ?
I wrongly supported ms. Nikki Haley over Trump only to learn she is like or worse than ms. Clinton in hatred for Arabs or ‘love’ for Israel? Haley also said she supports pardoning Trump for the ‘sake of the country’, but that is just another sissy position, and why Trump loves to threaten bloody wars… We cannot pardon criminals out of fear, then arrogantly hunt the truthful against the world — love for the world over country, love and blessings to the truthful over respite for criminals…
Although the Assange issue was largely due to U.S bad leaders, history should closely study how U.K. and Australian leaders handled or mishandled the issue. The U.K. conservatives, male and female, of about four leaders were dangerous puppets to u.s and showed no respect for Australia and truth in general. Crediting folks like Jeremy Corbyn is also vital, but the UK voters are guilty at many levels, including the allowing of wasting millions of dollars to hunt a truthful person. History must study how African leaders never fight for their citizens on such. History must expose how terribly Trump pressured Ecuador and UK leaders. History must remind activists to rush to Russia or the Russian embassy, when exposing western wrongs. May God bless me to conquer the world, regardless of who sits, and bless me through Showlove Trinity: Let’s learn, let’s work, let’s have fun.
Jarga k. Gigo
An Activist and Transformer.
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn.
