The Federal Government under President Bola Tinubu has withdrawn the criminal defamation suit filed against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, bringing an end to the controversial case that sparked nationwide debate over free speech and political accountability.
The suit, instituted by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) against the senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, was formally struck out on Thursday, January 15, 2026, following the filing of a Notice of Discontinuance by the prosecution.
The notice, dated December 12, 2025, led the court to terminate proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, which bordered on criminal defamation and related charges arising from comments made by the senator during a televised interview.
Justice C. N. Oji, who presided over the matter, acknowledged the notice and accordingly struck out the case. In his remarks, the judge said the development highlighted the need for restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” Justice Oji said.
Counsel representing the Federal Government confirmed the withdrawal in open court, stating that the decision was taken in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, we have filed a notice of discontinuance in line with extant legal provisions,” the counsel said. “This decision is taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.”
Reacting after the court session, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the outcome as a vindication and an affirmation of democratic values.
“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while thanking her legal team and supporters for their backing.
The withdrawal of the case follows months of legal controversy and sustained public criticism, with several civil society groups and rights advocates condemning the charges as an attempt to stifle free expression and political engagement.
