After watching the purported and alleged video of Abbas’s encounter that is circulating, and going through the statements and responses of concerned individuals on Facebook, my head is saturated with pressing and often conflicting questions. Knowing fully well that I am not a military personnel—though I was born and raised in army barracks for a significant part of my life—I find myself grappling with these issues more than ever.
Why should a soldier be ordered to disarm by peers rather than a superior officer? This raises fundamental concerns about authority and order within the military. Abbas should have been instructed to submit his rifle to the armory instead of facing potential confrontation with his colleagues. Such a protocol not only respects the chain of command but also ensures safety and clarity in high-stress situations.
Furthermore, what legal protocols are in place to ensure that disarming actions are conducted fairly? Is it acceptable for officers to intervene when an order is issued? Leaders must maintain discipline while preventing escalation, and clarity in these procedures is essential for effective command.
The case also highlights troubling issues regarding Abbas’s prolonged detention. Is it justifiable for someone to be held for six years without proper medical treatment or formal charges? According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted on December 10, 1948, in Paris during the United Nations General Assembly, every individual is entitled to a fair trial and humane treatment. Article 10 specifically states that “everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal.” Shouldn’t there be a clear timeline for prosecution or dismissal, ideally within three to six months, to align with these fundamental rights?
These questions underscore the urgent need for a reassessment of military procedures to protect individual rights. How can we ensure that actions taken against personnel like Abbas are constitutional and just? What measures can be implemented to prevent such extended detentions and ensure that all military personnel receive fair treatment?
This situation demands serious dialogue and actionable solutions that uphold both military integrity and individual rights, in accordance with the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The need for constitutional clarity in disarming military personnel is not just an operational concern; it is a moral imperative.
Abu can be reached via danjumaabu3750@gmail.com or +2348062380296
